Risko v. Risko
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
The two appeals before us in this cause arise out of a separate maintenance and support suit, one phase of which has airead}’ received our attention. Risko v. Risko, 136 N. J. Eq. 93; 40 Atl. Rep. (2d) 545. When the controversy between the parties was last before us, we affirmed an order refusing to reduce the alimony to be paid by the husband to the wife; and we modified the same order which adjudged the husband in contempt and directed that he be committed to jail, by holding that in lieu of his commitment a fine not too large should be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re BraunsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1930
- Nemm v. BrandleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Sagarese v. HollandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- Petrozello v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952