Legal Opinion

Risko v. Risko

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 5, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The two appeals before us in this cause arise out of a separate maintenance and support suit, one phase of which has airead}’ received our attention. Risko v. Risko, 136 N. J. Eq. 93; 40 Atl. Rep. (2d) 545. When the controversy between the parties was last before us, we affirmed an order refusing to reduce the alimony to be paid by the husband to the wife; and we modified the same order which adjudged the husband in contempt and directed that he be committed to jail, by holding that in lieu of his commitment a fine not too large should be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re BraunsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1930
  2. Nemm v. BrandleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Sagarese v. HollandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Petrozello v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API