Legal Opinion
In re Jumpsport, Inc.
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided October 3, 2018No. MDL No. 2858Published
1Opinion of the Court
SARAH S. VANCE, Chair
Before the Panel:* Defendants1 in these six actions,2 move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Eastern District of Texas. This litigation consists of two actions *1357pending in the Northern District of Georgia and four actions pending in the Eastern District of Texas, as listed on Schedule A. Common plaintiff JumpSport, Inc., initially opposed centralization, but now supports the motion.
On the basis of the papers filed and the hearing session held, we conclude that centralization is not necessary for the convenience of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In re Louisiana-Pacific Corp. Trimboard Siding Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Arrivalstar S.A. Fleet Management Systems Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
- In re Constellation Technologies LLC Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014