Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dullenty v. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1986No. 15889Published

1DissentBistline, Justice

Our task in this case was not, as the majority suggests, simply to determine whether “the specific exclusion relied upon by Rocky Mountain which denies coverage in these circumstances, is void as against public policy,” but to determine whether it was void as against the legislature’s policy as stated in Idaho’s Uninsured Motorist Coverage Statute, I.C. § 41-2502. In pursuit of a supposed requirement of a judicial policy to protect insurance companies from having to make good on their statutory and contractual obligations, the majority of a necessity ignores both the dictates of I.C. §…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sterling v. BloomIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API