Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Davis v. Jumper Creek Drainage District

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 30, 1943PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, J.:

From a judgment dismissing an action of mandamus, for want of proper parties respondent, relator appeals.

Jumper Creek Drainage District was formed pursuant to the general drainage law of Florida. The benefits to the land in the district assessed exceeded a million dollars. Bonds totaling nearly a half million were issued. The total tax levied and prorated against the property was nearly a million dollars. The supervisors of the district allowed certain property owners to pay off and discharge the total tax assessed against their property.

Ninety-eight per cent of the payment of this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First State Savings Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Jumper Creek Drainage District v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  3. Roach v. Loxahatchee Groves Water Control DistrictDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Sarasota-Fruitville Drainage DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API