Legal Opinion
Akzo Coatings, Inc. v. Aigner Corp.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided July 19, 1996No. 3:91-cv-00570PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
This cause comes before the court on the motion for partial summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Akzo Coatings and O’Brien Corporation, and the motion for partial summary judgment filed by the RD/RA Settling Defendants. 1 Both motions seek a finding that certain parties are hable for contribution pursuant to § 113(f) of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f). The court presumes a familiarity with the court’s prior orders in this cause, including those reported at Akzo Coatings, Inc. v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Akzo Coatings, Incorporated, and the O'Brien Corporation v. Aigner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. WardDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
- Town of Munster, Indiana v. Sherwin-Williams Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Conery v. Bath AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Axel Johnson, Inc. v. Carroll Carolina Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., and the O'Brien Corporation v. Aigner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Sierra Club v. Seaboard Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- ASHLEY II OF CHARLESTON, LLC v. PCS Nitrogen, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- Sierra Club, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.