In Re David Q. Rogers v. the State of Texas

NUMBER 13-25-00585-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE DAVID Q. ROGERS ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices Cron and Fonseca Memorandum Opinion by Justice Fonseca1 By pro se petition for writ of mandamus, relator David Q. Rogers contends that the trial court 2 abused its discretion by failing to comply with the mandate that we issued in 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so,” but “[w]hen granting relief, the court…