Legal Opinion

Barnes v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1944No. 30424PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

It will readily be seen from the evidence that the jury were fully authorized to return a verdict of illegally shooting at another. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are not meritorious.

There are three special grounds.(a) Special ground 1 assigns error on the following charge: “If you find, in considering the evidence, that there is a conflict in the testimony between the witnesses, or a conflict between the witness or witnesses and the defendant’s statement, then I tell you you are the exclusive judges as to the credibility of the witnesses.” Error is assigned on this charge,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Eidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cash v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Pueblo v. Vázquez SandovalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  3. Cox v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. People v. Vázquez SandovalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API