Crosby v. State

1. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial complains that the court erred in holding that a certain juror in the panel of forty-eight jurors drawn to try the accused was disqualified and in excluding him from the panel. The ground, however, does not show nor allege that this ruling was prejudicial to the accused, and, therefore, it raises no question for consideration by this court. It is well settled that a plaintiff in error must show, not merely error, but harmful error.

2. It appears from the second special ground, complaining of the admission of certain testimony, that the…