Legal Opinion

Edmondson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1928No. 11410PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The offense is murder, penalty fifteen years.

Attorneys for the state have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, based upon two grounds:(1) Because the transcript in this case was not filed within ninety days after the adjournment of the court at which conviction was had.(2) Because the transcript was forwarded by the attorney ' of appellant and not by the district clerk. '

Under the terms of Arts. 843 and 845, C. C. P., it is made the duty of the clerk to prepare and forward the transcript to this court. It was said in Young v. State, 86 Tex. Crim. Rep. 594: “The accused is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gould v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Winn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  2. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Vasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  4. Edmondson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API