Legal Opinion

Ransome v. Mimms

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 5, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 70-893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

The defendants herein have moved under Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for dismissal of the complaint upon the grounds that it fails to state a claim for which relief can be granted. The controversy arises from proceedings instituted by the defendants, landlords, resulting in the eviction of the plaintiff, tenant. It is alleged that after the judgment of the magistrate evicting the plaintiff from the premises, on which he had operated a profitable business, the plaintiff was induced by the fraudulent representations of the defendant to forego…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Huggins v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  3. Pete v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Bryan v. BRYANSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Whitman v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wisdom v. NealDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1982
  2. Skipper v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1978
  3. Bostick Oil Co. v. Michelin Tire Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API