Legal Opinion

In RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, And Products Liability Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 22, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00818Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: HAIR RELAXER MARKETING MDL No. 3060 SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Master Docket No. 23-cv-0818 Judge Mary M. Rowland MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee, and the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (collectively the “PLC”) moved for entry of an order [351] to establish protocols and procedures to govern common benefit fees and expenses in MDL No. 3060. Counsel from Keller Postman LLC, who represents individual Plaintiffs in this…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API