Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. ADP, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 17, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00898Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 NATHANAEL RUTLEDGE, Case No.: 22-cv-0898-L-BLM 7 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 8 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST, SECOND, 9 ADP, INC., FOURTH, SIXTH, AND EIGHTH 10 Defendant. CLAIMS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) AND GRANTING 11 PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND 12 [ECF No. 10] 13 14 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal 15 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff opposed the motion, (ECF No. 16 11), and Defendant replied, (ECF No. 15). The Court decides…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.