Legal Opinion

Herm v. Stafford

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 27, 1981No. 6651-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BALLANTINE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of the defendants, Joseph L. Arnold and John W. Morgan, for summary judgment. The moving defendants were named in a second amended complaint which was filed October 20,1972. We will consider the motions separately.

On September 5,1978, the Court denied a similar motion by these defendants and granted leave to plaintiffs to amend their second amended complaint to set forth with particularity the circumstances giving rise to their claim of fraudulent concealment. F.R.Civ.P. 9(b).

The amendment to the second amended…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,586, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,632 Joseph A. Carothers v. W. Thomas RiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. Willmar Poultry Company v. Morton-Norwich Products, Inc., and Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. Herm v. StaffordDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AdamsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2007
  2. Herm v. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API