Legal Opinion

People v. Clarke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to recorder’s court of Detroit. (Chapin, J.) Respondent was convicted of willful neglect of duty and corrupt conduct in the execution of his duty in canvassing election returns. The facts are .stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

Kespondent was charged, under section 9367, How. Stat., with willful neglect of duty and corrupt conduct in the execution of his duty in canvassing election returns.

The information alleges that respondent “was guilty of willful neglect of duty and of corrupt conduct in the execution of his duty,” etc. The statute provides that if any officer “shall be guilty of any willful neglect of such duty, or of any corrupt conduct in the execution of the same,” etc. The information follows the language of the statute, except that the conjunctive, and not the disjunctive, is used, the reference being to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Flagg v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. ConteMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. EnrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. People v. DumasMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People v. BrockettMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. People v. DurhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API