Wright v. Nooth
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Petitioner appeals a general judgment denying his petition for post-conviction relief. He asserts that the post-conviction court erred in failing to conclude that he was denied adequate assistance of counsel under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, and under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We affirm.
Petitioner was convicted by a jury of first-degree kidnapping, ORS 163.235, and attempted first-degree rape, ORS 163.375. After an unsuccessful appeal, petitioner brought this petition for post-conviction relief, claiming inadequate assistance of trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heroff v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Maney v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017