Legal Opinion

Escote Manufacturing Company v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 14, 1959No. 411-56PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

Plaintiff sues for the return of a contract bid deposit on the ground that its offer was not accepted by defendant within the time stipulated therein. Defendant counterclaims for damages for breach of plaintiff’s contract to purchase.

The facts are these: On August 19r 1955, the defendant, acting through the property disposal officer at Picatinny Arsenal, invited sealed bids on 52 items of surplus material under Invitation No. 28-017-S-56-5. By the terms of such invitation, bids were to be received until 10:30 A.M. daylight saving time, September 12, 1955, and then to be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. John McShain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  2. St. Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1902
  3. Gillespie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Dale Construction Co. v. United States, Seaboard Surety Co.United States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Penn-Ohio Steel Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Lublin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. United States v. American Renaissance Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API