Vermont Loan & Trust Co. v. Bramel
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The defendant first assigns as error that the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to file a cross-complaint. Under Section 390, Or. L., as amended in 1917, it is unnecessary for defendant to file a cross-complaint in an action at law, but where such defendant is entitled to relief, arising out of facts requiring the interposition of a court of equity, and material to his defense, he may set such matter up by answer without the necessity of filing a complaint on the equity side of the court. This was probably one of the reasons why the court denied the defendant right to file a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Le Clare v. ThibaultOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Gabel v. ArmstrongOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Hardin v. EmmonsNevada Supreme Court · 1898
- Nunn v. BirdOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Chance v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crisman v. CorbinOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Pfleeger v. SWANSONOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Hawthorne v. WaltonNevada Supreme Court · 1956
- Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1962