Legal Opinion

Riley v. Simmons

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 13, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-3626PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the joint motion of defendants Fred Brown, Edward Bull, Stephen Carlotti, Raymond Cart-ledge, E. James Ferland, Ellen Futter, Paul Hardin, Peter Harris, John Huck, John Kreamer, Rocco Maraño, Ted Simmons, Josh Westons, and Henry Kates (collectively “defendants”), former directors of Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company (“Mutual Benefit” or the “Company”), to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) for failure to state the fraud claim with particularity; Rule 12(b)(1) for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riley v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re First Interregional Equity Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,521Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Riley v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API