Legal Opinion

United States v. Bruce Taeru Kadota

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1985No. 84-1667PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Chief Judge.

Bruce Kadota appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for reduction of sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). Kadota contends the district court based its denial of the motion on Kadota’s failure to personally present at trial or sentencing his self-incriminating version of the crime. In doing so, Kadota claims the district court violated his fifth amendment right not to testify against himself. We find no abuse of discretion by the district court in denying Kadota’s rule 35 motion, and therefore affirm the judgment below.

In a trial to the court on stipulated facts,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Collins Spencer Catch the BearCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Owen B. Nerren, United States of America v. Edward L. NerrenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Robert William EddyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony DecologeroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Louis Distasio, Sr., United States of America v. Jerry J. DistasioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Rosa Santiago, United States of America v. Ariel SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Micheal L. GruenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API