Legal Opinion

People v. Friedlander

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDye, J.

In this appeal by permission, we again deal with the admissibility into evidence of a statement made by an accused not in the presence of retained counsel.

The facts establish that, pursuant to a duly issued and valid warrant, the business premises of a codefendant, Tele-A-Flash, Inc., and the apartment where this defendant, Friedlander, resided, were simultaneously searched on the afternoon of January 3, 1962, in connection with alleged book-making activities. A quantity of evidentiary material, documentary and otherwise, was seized.

On the same afternoon the defendant Friedlander was taken to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. People v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. IannacconeNew York Supreme Court · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API