Legal Opinion

City of Tuskegee v. Segrest

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 21, 1983No. 81-486, 81-514Published

1Per curiam

Nora and Henry Segrest sought specific performance of a right of first refusal contained in two recorded deeds to repurchase approximately 461.37 acres. The case was tried before the trial judge, who made the following findings, among others:

The Segrests in 1961 by two deeds conveyed the suit property to Atomedic Research Center, Inc. (Atomedic). The Seg-rests did not want to sell the property, but were persuaded to do so (a) because of their feeling of civic responsibility to allow the community to develop economically and (b) because Atomedic was a non-profit corporation with a humanitarian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodlawn Realty & Development Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. General Securities Corporation v. WeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Blackburn v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Rushton v. McKee & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Ex Parte Wallace Wallace Chemical OilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API