Rushton v. McKee & Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Circuit Court, Talladega County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge. Bill in equity by W. W. Rushton against McKee & Clo. and others. Decree for respondents, and complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMayfield, J.
The bill is for specific performance of a contract to convey in fee 1,920 acres of land, and timber rights to 240 acres, described in the bill as follows:
“Lands lying and being situate in the county of Talladega, state of Alabama, to wit: S. W. ¼ of Sec. 20, N. W. ¼ of Sec. 29, S. W. ¼ of Sec. 29, part of S. E. ¼ of Sec. 19, part of E. ½ of Sec. 30, S. W. ¼ of Sec. 30, N. W. ¼ of Sec. 31, E. ½ of Sec. 31, Sec. 25, all in Township 21, Ranges 1 & 2 E., and containing in all 1,920 acres, more or less, together with the timber rights on 240 acres, more or less, adjoining said above-described…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Express Co. v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Stanton v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Minge v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Karter v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Grand Bay Land Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- General Securities Corporation v. WeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Conway v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Downing v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.