United States v. Mauro
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SKRETNY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Presently before this Court is defendant Ben Rogers’ pre-trial motion to suppress all evidence obtained by the government directly or indirectly through testimony elicited from him pursuant to a grant of use and derivative-use immunity under 18 U.S.C. § 6002. Defendant argues that this evidence is inadmissible according to the principles enunciated in Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, 92 S.Ct. 1653, 32 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972). The government argues that all of its anticipated evidence was obtained from legitimate sources independent of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gary R. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Alfred CatinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Albert TantaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. VallejosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994