Legal Opinion
Raven v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 27, 2012No. 40809-1-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
¶1 The Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) found that Resa Raven,1 a court-appointed limited guardian, neglected her ward, Ida, by failing to provide the medical services Ida needed to maintain her health and prevent harm and pain to her. Raven appealed and the administrative law judge found no neglect. The DSHS Board of Appeals (Board)2 reversed the administrative law judge, concluding that Raven neglected Ida by inattention and by failing to ensure that Ida’s medical needs were met under the abuse of vulnerable adults act, chapter 74.34 RCW. The superior court reversed and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Raven v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012