Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Bristol Excavating, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 7, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16–CV–01512Published

1Opinion of the Court

KAROLINE MEHALCHICK, United States Magistrate Judge

Resolution of the three pending motions for summary judgment requires the Court to determine whether an employer must include bonuses accrued by employees in *527the regular rate of pay for work the employees performed for a third-party, where the third-party set the standards for earning the bonus, and paid the bonus to the employer, who then paid the employees. In an apparent matter of first impression, the Court finds that bonuses originating from and determined exclusively by a third-party must be included in the regular rate of pay of an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API