United States v. Baugham
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court is petitioner Reginald Baugham’s pro se Motion [646] to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Upon consideration of petitioner’s pro se Motion [646], the Government’s Opposition [658], the entire record herein, the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth below, petitioner’s motion will be denied.
1. BACKGROUND
Petitioner Reginald Baugham (“Baugham” or “Petitioner”) was a prominent player in a drug conspiracy located near the intersection of 60th and Blaine Streets, Northeast, from…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- USA v. MarburyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- United States v. ChansleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- United States v. FairlambDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.