Legal Opinion

United States v. Baugham

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 24, 2013No. Criminal No. 01-253-02 (RCL)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Now before the Court is petitioner Reginald Baugham’s pro se Motion [646] to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Upon consideration of petitioner’s pro se Motion [646], the Government’s Opposition [658], the entire record herein, the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth below, petitioner’s motion will be denied.

1. BACKGROUND

Petitioner Reginald Baugham (“Baugham” or “Petitioner”) was a prominent player in a drug conspiracy located near the intersection of 60th and Blaine Streets, Northeast, from…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. USA v. MarburyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  3. United States v. ChansleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  4. United States v. FairlambDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
  5. United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API