Legal Opinion

Muller v. State Life Insurance

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1901No. 3,344PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Tippecanoe Superior Court; W. D. Wallace, Judge. Action by State Life Insurance Company against E. Reynolds Muller, on note. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobihsost, J.

\Appellee sued appellant upon a promissory note. Appellant answered in two paragraphs, and also filed what is termed a counterclaim in two paragraphs. Demurrers to each paragraph of counterclaim were sns*47tainecl. Appellant then withdrew both paragraphs of answer, and, refusing to make any further defense and electing to rely upon the counterclaim, judgment was rendered upon the note in appellee’s favor. Sustaining the demurrers to the counterclaim is assigned as error.

The note sued on is dated February 25, 1899, is signed by appellant, and promises to pay appellee three months after date…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lowery v. State Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Mygatt v. . New York Protection Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Swan v. . Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Thomas v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Boland v. Whitman, Receiver of & Sinnissippi InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robison v. WolfIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API