Legal Opinion

In re Sreter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding to quash a subpoena duces tecum, the appeal is from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, dated July 2, 1976, which *937denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The books and records described in the subpoena are required to be kept by petitioner in compliance with sections 2803 and 2803-b of the Public Health Law and 10 NYCRR 730.6. Petitioner cannot avoid production thereof on the theory that their contents tend to incriminate her (see Matter of Kent Nursing Home v Office of Special State Prosecutor for Health & Social Servs., 49 AD2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Sigety v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Kent Nursing Home v. Office of Special State Prosecutor for Health & Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lap v. Office of Special State Prosecutor for Health & Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API