Legal Opinion

Converse Bridge Co. v. Collins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Geneva Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. J. W. Foster. The case is stated in the opinion. cited, Motile cG Ohio lili. Go. v. Copeland, 63 Ala. 219; Montgomery cG Búfala li. R. Co. v. Culver, To Ala. 587; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Meyer, 78 Ala. 597; Motile é Ohio R. R. Co. v. Dismuhesj 18 Am. and Eng. Encyc. of Law, pp. 225-6; 3 It, 933.

1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.

Appellant, defendant in the court below, delivered to the Cleveland, Cin. Chic. & St. L. Railroad Co. at Columbus, Ohio, two car loads of bridge material, consigned to itself at Eunola, Alabama, and paid the full freight charges thereon through to Geneva, Alabama, which town is close by Eunola. The goods Avere receiAred by the railroad company under an agreement, as shoAvn by the bill of lading, to carry them “to the said destination, if on its road, or otherwise to deliver them to another carrier on the road to said destination,” and were transported by it to Cincinnati, and there delivered…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. Standard Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SinquefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Garnett v. Parry Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Austin & Sons v. HunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API