Legal Opinion

Austin & Sons v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari to Court of Appeals. Action by Connie Hunter against C. H. Austin & Sons and others, on a garnishment bond. Judgment for plaintiff, and on appeal to the Court of Appeals, the cause was affirmed, and appellants bring certiorari to review the judgment and decision of the Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This cause comes to us by certiorari from the Court of Appeals. When first considered by that court the case was reversed and remanded; but on application for a rehearing the judgment of reversal was set aside, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed.

The record informs us that the appellee, Connie Hunter, brought suit against the appellants, C. H. Austin & Sons, and the sureties on the garnishment bond which they had executed to procure the issuance of a writ of garnishment in aid of a previous suit, pending in a justice court, which C. H. Austin & Sons had brought on account against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peet & Co. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Logan v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Converse Bridge Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Standard Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SinquefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Security Finance Co. v. Kelly's Tire ShopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Burrow v. LeigeberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API