De Noya v. Hill Inv. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Fourth District, of the Territory of Oklahoma., Sitting at Pawhuska, within and for the Osage Indian Reservation; Bayard T. Hainer, Judge. Action by the Hill Investment Company against Clement De Noya. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. This is an action on a promissory -note originally brought in the territorial district court of Pawhuska by defendant in error against plaintiff in error.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Fourth District, of the Territory of Oklahoma., Sitting at Pawhuska, within and for the Osage Indian Reservation; Bayard T. Hainer, Judge. Action by the Hill Investment Company against Clement De Noya. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. This is an action on a promissory -note originally brought in the territorial district court of Pawhuska by defendant in error against plaintiff in error. The facts upon which it is based are substantially as follows: For some time before the 29th day of September, 1900, one Johnson and one McLaughlin, doing business…
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The first assignment of error urged goes to the jurisdiction of the trial court. Subsequent to’ the organization of the territorial government in the territory of Oklahoma and prior to June 7, 1897, the Osage Indian reservation was, by order of the Supreme Court of the territory, attached to Pawnee county for all judicial purposes. On the last-mentioned date an act of Congress was approved which contains the following provision:
“And the justices of the peace and the probate courts in and for the territory of Oklahoma shall not have jurisdiction of any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Clevenger v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Randolph v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Cotton v. John Deere Plow Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Goodson v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barceló v. SaldañaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1931