Legal Opinion
Ottinger v. Voorhis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 22, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, P. J.:
The petitioner applied for a peremptory mandamus order “ directing the said respondents, constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, to forthwith comply with the provisions of section 243 of the Election Law and adopt for use at elections in the city of New York any kind of voting machine approved by the State Board of Voting Machine Commissioners or the use of which has been specifically authorized by law.” Mr. Justice Lazansky at Special Term (N. Y. L. J. March 28, 1925) was of opinion that on the papers presented to the court, the respondent board of elections…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Burr v. . VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- State ex rel. Hawes v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- International Railway Co. v. SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- People Ex Rel. Hasbrouck v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Eiss v. SummersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MATTER OF CAVAGES, INC. v. KetterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Conrad v. HackettNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- Pecora v. Queens County Bar Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Horwitz v. SchwabNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Flynn v. Ensign Ribbon Burners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946