Legal Opinion

Grimes v. . Guion

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"WiNBORNE, J.

The ruling of the court in sustaining demurrer ore tenus to the further defense set up by defendant, Amelia Guion, finds support in the case of Wood v. Tinsley, 138 N. C., 507, 51 S. E., 59, upon authority of which judgment below must be affirmed. The decision there is epitomized in the headnote: “Since the Connor Act (Laws 1885, ch. 147), one who goes into possession of land under a parol contract to convey, paying the purchase money and making improvements thereon, cannot assert the right to remain in possession until he is repaid tbe amount expended for tbe purchase-money and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Smith v. . FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Wood v. Tinsley.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Spence v. . Pottery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Wood v. . LeweySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AMH Roman Two NC, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  2. Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. State Trust Co. v. BraznellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Eller v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API