Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The defendant took 19 exceptions during the course of the trial, but in his brief abandons all of them except four. Two of these relate to the same subject matter and may be considered together. The other two are to the refusal of the judge to set aside the verdict of the jury and to the rendering and signing of the judgment, and may be ■considered formal or, rather, fully discussed under the other exceptions.

Defendant claims that the court committed error in admitting in evidence the testimony of Sheriff Tart to the effect .that, the defendant having asserted that he spent the time before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Earnhardt v. Clement.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Ripley v. . ArledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Johnson v. MassengillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API