Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Bennett

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 20, 1990No. 13-89-505-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a trial court’s order sustaining appellees’ plea to the jurisdiction. By three points of error 1 , appellant argues that the trial court erred because the issues before the trial court were not matters incident to the settlement of an estate, the probate proceedings and this suit do not concern the same parties and that the trial court failed to conduct a hearing. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Appellant, Tad Carlisle, is a beneficiary under the Last Will and Testament of Nell Carlisle, deceased, which was admitted to probate in June, 1983,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seay v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. English v. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Thomas v. TollonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Goodwin v. Kent, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1988
  5. Home Savings Ass'n v. Bevers, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Cherokee County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Palmer v. Coble Wall Trust Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Carroll v. Carroll, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  4. Burns v. Burns, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  5. Bruflat v. Rodeheaver, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API