Napier v. Noplis
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
' MILLIKEN, Judge.
The controlling issue in this election contest is the meaning and applicability of the so-called “20% rule” usually attributed to our 1908 opinion by Judge O’Rear in Harrison v. Stroud, 129 Ky. 193, 110 S.W. 828. For collection of cases, see Ky. Digest, Elections,
The “rule” has been used to determine when an entire election or the vote in a precinct should be nullified by the court.
After a recount of the votes cast in the November 1957 election for magistrate in Perry County, Noplis, the contestee and appellee in the present action, was declared the winner by a 30 vote…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harrison v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Banks v. SergentCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- Taylor v. NuetzelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Hogg v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Jackson v. BoltCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Upton v. KnucklesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Watts v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
- Sims v. AtwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Dupin v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Wells v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.