Legal Opinion

Heidmar, Inc. v. Anomina Ravennate Di Armamento Sp.A.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 20, 1997No. C.A. No. C-97-151Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND ORDER SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ FIRST AMENDED MOTION TO VACATE ARREST AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO RECONSIDER

JACK, District Judge.

On this date came on to be considered Defendants Anomina Ravennate Di Armamento Sp.A. of Ravenna and A.R.A. Anomina Ravennate Di Armamento Sp.A. in person-am (“Ravennate”) and M/V PEGASUS ERRE, her hull, engines, machinery, tackle, apparel, furniture, etc., in rem’s (“PEGASUS…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Wallace v. Texas Tech Univ.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API