Legal Opinion

Riley v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 20, 2012No. 11-P-1703PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.

The plaintiff, Michael Riley, was convicted in 1986 of manslaughter and other charges as a joint venturer, but the Supreme Judicial Court reversed his convictions due to violations of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968) (Bruton). See Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 405 Mass. 646, 660 (1989) (reversing convictions of Leo Cunningham and Riley because of Bruton errors). At a retrial, Riley was acquitted of all charges. Following passage of the Erroneous Convictions *210Law, G. L. c. 258D, Riley brought this action seeking compensation for his wrongful conviction and imprisonment. The question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. BacigalupoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. Guzman v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Drumgold v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Irwin v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Cruz v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2023
  3. Silva-Santiago v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API