Legal Opinion
Barboza v. Weinstein & Riley, P.S.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided October 1, 2020No. 4:20-cv-00104Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MARIO A. BARBOZA, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No.: 4:20-cv-104-KPJ § WEINSTEIN & RILEY, P.S.; and § PALLIDA LLC., § § Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendants Weinstein & Riley, P.S. (“Weinsten”) and Pallida LLC’s (“Pallida”) (together, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”) (Dkt. 2), to which Plaintiff Mario A. Barboza (“Plaintiff”) filed a response (the “Response”) (Dkt. 14), and Defendants filed a reply (the “Reply”) (Dkt. 23).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Collins v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, Miss.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Rotkiske v. KlemmSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.