Legal Opinion

Campbell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1982No. 80-1044PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

A jury found appellant guilty of threats to do bodily harm in violation of D.C.Code 1981, § 22-507. Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction on the ground that the trial judge improperly allowed evidence of appellant’s prior wrongful conduct to be placed before the jury. 1 We agree and reverse.

I

A. The Government’s Evidence

At approximately 4:00 a. m. on the morning of May 3,1980, Anita Scholfield and her children were awakened by a telephone call. Miss Scholfield recognized the caller’s voice as that of appellant, with whom she had been romantically involved for about…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. Carl BenedettoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Daniel James PowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Sherer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Settles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API