Legal Opinion

Alabama State Bar Ex Rel. Steiner v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 11, 1968No. 3 Div. 273PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOHN, Justice.

On July 10, 1964, the Grievance Committee of the Alabama State Bar preferred charges against the appellee, Bob Moore, Jr., for violating or failing to comply with Rule 36, Section A of the Rules Governing Conduct of Attorneys in Alabama, as' last amended, and as formulated and promulgated by the Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, and approved by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Rule 36, Section A, supra, provides as follows:

“No person heretofore or hereafter admitted to practice law in Alabama, shall * * *
“No person licensed to practice law in the Courts of the State…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. In Re McGarryIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Haley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. In Re JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Albuquerque City CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Simpson v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Alabama State Bar v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. James v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Alabama State Bar Ex Rel. Steiner v. AderholtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API