Legal Opinion · Dissent

Martin-Marietta Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 14, 1969No. 245-67Published

1DissentDavis, Judge

The solution to this case lies in one’s evaluation of the scope and purpose of Section 1481 of the 1954 Code. The court applies subsection (a), but then, taking subsection (b) strictly and literally, finds that Congress has made no provision for a case like this in which the renegotiation affects loss-years or years in which there can be no tax “credit” (in the strict use of that term). Therefore, the court holds, the ordinary rules as to interest must apply (after subsection (a) has had its effect). My difference with the court is that I think that Congress intended Section 1481, as a whole,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Oil Products Co. v. Campbell (United States, Intervenor) (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. Kurtzon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  3. Joseph T. Miller and Crystal v. Miller v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Stow Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. Baltimore Foundry & Machine Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API