Joseph T. Miller and Crystal v. Miller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.
This proceeding 1 for redetermination of a deficiency of $24,772.05 in the 1946 income tax of each of the petitioners presented below two questions for decision: (1) Did the respondent properly compute the deficiencies? (2) Is he estopped from asserting them?
The Tax Court, in an opinion 2 fully and correctly setting out the facts, answered the first question in the affirmative on the authority of Kurtzon v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 1542, a case which involved a similar issue under comparable facts. It answered the sec ond question in the negative, basing its answer on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Kurtzon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
3Cited by24 opinions
- Midland Mortg. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Estate of Goodall v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Wilkes-Barre Carriage Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963
- Service Bolt & Nut Co. Profit Sharing Trust v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
- Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.