First Nat. Bank of Hobart v. Spink
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Caddo and Kiowa Counties; F. E. Gillette, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Hobart against George A. Spink and others, defendants, and'the City National Bank of Hobart, garnishee. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C. J.
On the 30th day of July, A. D. 1906, before the Hon. F. E. Gillette, judge of the district court for Caddo and Kiowa counties, in chambers, in the city of Anadarko, after due notice motion was presented to have the herein garnishment dissolved, and the garnishees discharged. After hearing said motion, same was sustained, the garnishment dissolved, and the garnishee discharged. Thereupon plaintiff prayed an appeal to the Supreme Court of the territory, and same was allowed, at the same time 30 days being allowed plaintiff to make and serve a case-made, and 10 days to suggest amendments, to be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Herring v. WigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
3Cited by15 opinions
- Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Mitchener v. City Com'rs, City of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Bash v. HowaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. MerrittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Incorporated Town of ChelseaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.