Legal Opinion

Contemporary Mission, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Famous Music Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 18, 1977No. 575, 616, Dockets 76-7403, 76-7440Published

1Opinion of the Court

557 F.2d 918

2 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 16

CONTEMPORARY MISSION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,

v.

FAMOUS MUSIC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 575, 616, Dockets 76-7403, 76-7440.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 22, 1976.

Decided May 18, 1977.

William B. Lawless, New York City (John F. Triggs, Hawkins, Delafield & Wood, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

William D. O'Reilly, Windham, N. H., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MANSFIELD, VAN GRAAFEILAND and MESKILL, Circuit Judges.

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

1

This is an appeal by Famous Music…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API