Legal Opinion

Brown v. Chicago Park District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 18, 1991No. 1-90-0246PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaPORTA

Plaintiff through his next friend, his mother, filed suit against the Chicago Park District after her son’s foot was injured when a mirror fell from the wall of a park district indoor public shower. The mirror was originally placed behind a pipe in the shower stall by an unknown third party not involved in the litigation. Plaintiff alleged defendant’s conduct in not removing the mirror before the injury constituted a willful and wanton act because park district employees knew of the existence and in fact had used the mirror in the past. Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and amended twice…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT DIST.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Majewski v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Lester v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Nyman v. Washington State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Winfrey v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Ward v. Community Unit School District No. 220Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Oravek v. Community School District 146Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Mostafa v. City of Hickory HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Oropeza v. BOARD OF EDUC., CITY OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API