Superior Industries, LLC v. Thor Global Enterprises Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER.
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota dismissed with prejudice a patent infringement complaint filed by Superior Industries, LLC (“Superior”) against Thor Global Enterprises Ltd. (“Thor”) in part based on claim preclusion and in part for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Superior Indus., LLC v. Thor Global Enters. Ltd., No. 10-CV-2524, 2011 WL 3100335, at *3 (D.Minn. *1290July 22, 2011). Because Superior’s prior trademark infringement action did not arise…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lifetime Industries, Inc. v. Trim-Lok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- K-Tech Telecommunications, Inc. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Media Rights Technologies, Inc v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Lyda v. CBS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Uni-Sys., LLC v. U.S. Tennis Ass'n, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.