Legal Opinion
Atteberry v. Department of State Police
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided September 30, 2002No. 00-3275PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.
An employee experiencing a medical condition without medical restrictions is not similarly situated to an employee experiencing a medical condition with medical restrictions.
In 1999, Tracy L. Atteberry, f/k/a Tracy L. Garrett, requested to work light duty during her healthy pregnancy. Because her employer, the Illinois State Police (ISP), failed to provide light duty detail to Plaintiff everyday, she sued claiming she was discriminated against based on sex and pregnancy in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), et seq. (Title VII). She claims similarly situated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kimberly Hern Troupe v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Lord & TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bernard v. Sweetwater Sound, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Socorro Thome v. Department of Homeland Security, Merit Systems Protection Board2015