Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Osborn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Monroe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This action was by the appellee, as payee, against the appellant, as the maker of a promissory note. There was a motion to set aside the service of the process, a motion to quash the writ, a motion to dismiss the action, a motion to compel counsel for the appellant to produce and show his authority for appearing, a demurrer to the complaint, an answer in three paragraphs : first, the general denial; second, no consideration for the note; third, usury; demurrer sustained to the third paragraph of the answer, reply to the second, trial by jury, verdict for the plaintiff) motion by the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelley v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. VerbargIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Herold v. CoatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sietman v. GoecknerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  4. Commercial Corp. v. KruegerOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Smith v. Candle Creek Dredging Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API