Legal Opinion

Trichelle v. Sherman & Ellis, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1930No. Gen. No. 34,346PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

This was a suit to recover insurance predicated upon a so-called preliminary or temporary contract therefor generally referred to as an insurance binder. Defendant filed the general issue and several special pleas. Plea number two denied liability on the ground that the binder was unauthorized, number three, on the ground that it was not executed by defendant or anyone authorized by defendant, and the other special pleas set up noncompliance with some term or provision contained in the policy referred to in the binder.

The judgment under review was entered on the verdict of the jury against…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Baile v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  5. Lipman v. Niagara Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Salloum Foods & Liquor, Inc. v. Parliament InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Fisher v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  3. Sun Insurance Office Limited v. John ClayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Advanced Methods, Inc. v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  5. Jennings v. Illinois Automobile ClubAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API